What else is there to say about passage of the USA Freedom Act today by the House of Representatives? Like so many previous efforts to reign in the excesses of the intelligence community, what started out as an effort to end the bulk collection of data about Americans has now morphed into still another legal rationale designed to justify those abuses.
I doubt anyone is paying attention to any of this, especially as we head into the Memorial Day weekend here in the United States, so I won’t go into a lot of detail about what happened today in Washington. You can read more about that here, here and here. The main thing to avoid is deluding yourself into believing this is a step in the right direction as so many of the news stories in the mainstream media are attempting to portray it.
In reality, this is just another effort to provide new legal authority for the NSA to continue business as usual in the event it’s not able to secure renewal of the legal authorities it has been relying on, which are set to expire next year; and, as usual, Barack Obama was the cheerleader in the effort to defang this new legislation of any meaningful reforms.
To me Obama is the worst Democratic President in a century and perhaps the worst of all time. Along with George W. Bush, he’s done more to destroy what America once stood for and one can only hope history will judge him accordingly.
For those of you who care about things like this and may be still reading this blog, here is a link to how the different members of the House of Representatives voted today. A yea vote is a vote to permit the NSA to interpret the legislation any way it choose so don’t be surprised if your congressman is among those who voted once again to gut the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution.
In the event you forgot, the Fourth Amendment reads as follows: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.